At triage her vitals included a RR of 45, pulse 100 and O2 sat 70%. BP is unobtainable. She is rushed to your resuscitation area. Her exam
reveals an alert and oriented woman in extemis who is able to speak 1-2 word sentences
with a lot of accessory muscle use. On a NRB mask she manages an O2 sat of 94%.
The lack of BP makes you worry about a large PE with hypotension. The nurses
try again. Her JVP cannot be seen. There are diffuse crackles to the scapulae
and wheezes bilaterally. Heart sounds are normal and regular without murmurs.
There is no peripheral edema or leg swelling. The BP finally registers –
280/150!
Her EKG is below:
Sinus tachycardia with signs of LVH and strain (inverted
T’s). Comparison to her recent pre-op EKG shows no significant new findings.
Her CXR is below.
Consistent with pulmonary edema.
What is this patient? You could call her a hypertensive
emergency with CHF. You could call her acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. You
could call her a SCAPE patient
(Sympathetic Crashing Acute Pulmonary Edema, trademark Scott Weingart –
EMCrit podcast episode #1). As long as you label it something and identify how
to treat it, then you’ve achieved goal #1. Not to be confused with the hypotensive patient of cardiogenic shock - that's a different discussion altogether.
So what is the best way to treat this patient? The approach must address the vicious cycle of catecholamines driving increased afterload, leading to pulmonary edema, leading to more fear/stress-induced catecholamine surge. Most would
agree that NIPPV and nitrates are key. But what is the starting dose for
nitroglycerine? How should it be administered: IV. SL, patch? What about loop diuretics like
furosemide/Lasix?
An interesting Twitter conversation was started by Brian
Hayes (@PharmERToxGuy) stating that
although most drug refs suggest a starting dose of 10 mcg/min, the initial dose
for IV Nitro in acute pulmonary edema should be 50 mcg/min. Zach Kiker
(@zpkiker) and Haney Mallemat (@Criticalcarenow) also got in on the
conversation. See excerpts below:
Drug references suggest starting nitro drips at 10mcg/min. For cardiogenic pulmonary edema, start at 50-100mcg/min and titrate up rapidly.
— Bryan D. Hayes (@PharmERToxGuy) February 22, 2013
@pharmertoxguy @criticalcarenow Head to head trial low v high dose NTG?Personally always had very good success with low dose NTG and Bipap
— Zach Kiker (@zpkiker) February 22, 2013
@zpkiker High dose nitrates have fared better than low. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=94… @criticalcarenow
— Bryan D. Hayes (@PharmERToxGuy) February 22, 2013
@zpkiker And, 80mcg/min isn't really all that high. It's similar to giving a 400mcg SL tab every 5 minutes. @criticalcarenow
— Bryan D. Hayes (@PharmERToxGuy) February 22, 2013
@zpkiker @pharmertoxguy @criticalcarenow in my ED nurses get nervous @ dose >20mcg/min. So instead 2 spray=800mcg more palatable +drip+bipap
— ElishaT (@ETtube) February 22, 2013
@ettube @zpkiker @pharmertoxguy Had nursing concerns at last place where I worked. Advise joint teaching session so nurses can learn safety
— Haney Mallemat (@CriticalCareNow) February 22, 2013
So there is variability out there. This much we know. What
is best practice?
(This discussion will focus mainly on Nitrates and
Furosemide. References for ACEi and NIPPV are below.)
High dose nitrates:
A 2007 Ann Emerg Med feasibility study by Levy et al
demonstrated safety of a protocol using high dose nitrates (2 mg bolus q 3min
prn). The protocol was “...associated with endotracheal intubation, BiPAP, and
ICU admission less frequently than expected to occur without high-dose
nitroglycerin, and adverse events were uncommon.”
This 1998 Lancet study showed that for in patients
with acutely decompensated CHF in severe pulmonary edema, high-dose nitrates (3
mg bolus administered intravenously every 5 min) plus furosemide 40 mg IV was
superior to low-dose nitrates isosorbide dinitrate 1 mg/h, increased every 10
min by 1 mg/h) and high-dose furosemide (80 mg q 15 min). Less mechanical
ventilation and less myocardial infarctions.
What about furosemide?
Loop diuretics aim to reduce volume overload. In patients
with chronic fluid overload and acute exacerbations of CHF, diuresis is still a
mainstay. In acutely decompensated cardiogenic pulmonary edema, flush pulmonary
edema or your SCAPE/hypertensive pulmonary edema, this patients may actually be
volume deplete, in part due to the immense work of breathing required to
overcome the acute shortness of breath.
According to this Emedicine article, loop diuretics may
require up to 90 minutes to take effect, especially if there is intravascular
depletion and reduced GFR.
This Ann Int Med 1985 study demonstrated that in
severe CHF, furosemide activates the neurohormonal axis, leading to at least a
short-lived surge of catecholamines.
This 1993 study in J Am Soc Neph in dogs suggests
that furosemide in the acute phase of APE may lead to sodium retention.
Diuretics should perhaps be considered in the acutely
decompensated pulmonary edema patient after an hour of treatment if there is
evidence of overall volume overload.
NIPPV and Afterload reduction:
It is generally well accepted that positive pressure
ventilation via CPAP or BiPAP is beneficial in acute cardiogenic pulmonary
edema. There is variability between which modality is used. Both however reduce
work of breathing and also reduce preload and may help avert intubation. A 1997
RCT in Crit Care Med showed that vitals and ventilation were improved
more rapidly in BiPAP vs CPAP but that MI rate was higher in the BiPAP group.
Subsequent meta-analyses in Ann Intern Med 2010 showed that BiPAP may
trend towards lower mortality and that CPAP was associated with lower
mortality.
Often agents such as ACEi (captopril 25 mg po or enalapril
1.25 mg IV) can be considered for afterload reduction. Effect is often within
10 minutes. This, however, is not often my practice as I find patients often
settle down very quickly with NIPPV and nitrates. The Crashing Patient website provides a small breakdown of doses and studies if you wish to read
further.
What do some of the experts preach?
Scott Weingart’s legendary SCAPE podcast (Emcrit
Episode #1) urges a protocol of 400 mcg/min for 2 min followed by 100 mcg/min
and titration + NIPPV. “This first thing you do is get your lasix, and throw it
in the trash!”
As you can also see from the above Twitter discussion, some well-respected physicians are proponents of high-dose Nitro while others stay more conservative. Clearly there is practice variation. It seems a lot of this may be influenced by personal experience, as the literature (at least by my search) doesn't have a plethora of exceptionally good studies.
As you can also see from the above Twitter discussion, some well-respected physicians are proponents of high-dose Nitro while others stay more conservative. Clearly there is practice variation. It seems a lot of this may be influenced by personal experience, as the literature (at least by my search) doesn't have a plethora of exceptionally good studies.
Case Resolution:
The patient was given 2 sprays of SL Nitro 0.4mg/spray (for
a load of 800 mcg over about ? 5-10 min – ½ life according to Epocrates is
1-3min) while the IV Nitro was being hung. She was also placed on BIPAP. The IV
solution was started at 30 mcg/min and within 15 minutes her sats were 98% on
an FIO2 of 40% and her breathing less laboured. BP came down steadily to 160/90 and pulse in the 80's. Repeat CXR less than one hour
showed the following:
As you can see, substantially improved. She was admitted to the ward several hours later and did well.
What practice pattern do you follow? Do you agree with the discussion above? Comments encouraged and welcome! Either below or via Twitter.
References:
What practice pattern do you follow? Do you agree with the discussion above? Comments encouraged and welcome! Either below or via Twitter.
References:
Randomised trial of high-dose isosorbide dinitrate plus
low-dose furosemide versus high-dose furosemide plus low-dose isosorbide
dinitrate in severe pulmonary oedema. Cotter et al. Lancet. 1998 Feb
7;351(9100):389-93.
Treatment of severe decompensated heart failure with
high-dose intravenous nitroglycerin: a feasibility and outcome analysis.
Levy et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Aug;50(2):144-52.
Epub 2007 May 23.
Meta-analysis: Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic
pulmonary edema.
Weng et al. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(9):590.
Randomized, prospective trial of bilevel versus continuous
positive airway pressure in acute pulmonary edema.
Mehta S et al. Crit Care Med. 1997 Apr;25(4):620-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9142026
EMCrit Podcast 1-Sympathetic Crashing Acute Pulmonary Edema
Great Acute Pulmonary Edema summary at: The Crashing Patient
Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema (at Emedicine)
Acute Vasoconstrictor Response to Intravenous Furosemide in
Patients with Chronic Congestive Heart Failure: Activation of the Neurohumoral
Axis.
Francis G et al. Ann Intern Med. 1 July
1985;103(1):1-6 http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=699765
Low-Dose Atrial Natriuretic Factor and Furosemide in
Experimental Acute Congestive Heart Failure.
Felt D et al. J. Am Soc. Nephrol. 1993; 4:162-167) http://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/4/2/162.long
Some additional articles not referenced above:
Dr Smith’s ECG blog – case of hypertensive pulmonary edema
that was actually a STEMI. Always consider this. http://hqmeded-ecg.blogspot.ca/search/label/hypertension
Bolus i.v. nitroglycerin treatment of ischemic chest pain in
the ED.
Nashed et al. Am J Emerg Med. 1994 May;12(3):288-91.
Intravenous nitroglycerin boluses in treating patients with
cardiogenic pulmonary edema.
Nashed et al. Am J Emerg Med. 1995 Sep;13(5):612-3.
Intravenous nitrates in the prehospital management of acute
pulmonary edema.
Bertini et al. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Oct;30(4):493-9.
A Protocol of Bolus-Dose Nitroglycerin and Non-Invasive
Ventilation to Avert Intubation in Emergency Department Acute Pulmonary Edema
Mallick et al. Prepublication abstract.
Available at EMCrit website
http://emcrit.org/podcasts/scape/



Informative Article! Good to see somebody who really knows what they are talking about and can additionally produce common sense blog for us the reader. Certainly looking forward to your next article.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7dGAbUhFMQ
Thank you, Ethan. I'm glad you found this informative. Hopefully I'll have a new post up in the near future. Look forward to any further comments/feedback!
Delete-Elisha